An echo report is a densely technical document packed with acronyms, reference ranges, and Doppler numbers that can feel overwhelming on first read. This guide walks through every section of a typical report in plain English — what the measurements mean, what the normal ranges are, and what different findings usually indicate. It is a reference, not a diagnosis. Your own report can only be interpreted by a clinician who knows your clinical situation.
Haven’t had an echo yet? See our private echocardiogram overview or how echo compares to ECG, MRI, and CT.
The information on this page describes how echocardiogram measurements are structured and what typical reference ranges are. It cannot interpret your specific report. Individual numbers only make sense in the context of your age, body size, symptoms, other investigations, and medical history — all of which a clinician considers when writing or reviewing a report. If you are worried about a finding on your own report, speak to the clinician who ordered the scan, your GP, or the cardiologist who will follow up the result. If you are experiencing chest pain at rest, severe breathlessness, collapse, or any symptoms of a heart attack, call 999.
Almost every adult echocardiogram report follows the same structure, because it is written against the British Society of Echocardiography minimum dataset. Once you know the six sections and what each one covers, the report stops feeling like a wall of acronyms and starts reading like a structured medical note.
Your name, date of birth, height, weight, blood pressure on the day, heart rate, and — most importantly — the reason the scan was requested. The rest of the report should be read in the context of this reason.
A note on how clear the images were. Descriptions like "good", "adequate", "limited", or "poor windows" tell you how much confidence can be placed in the measurements that follow. Limited studies may prompt a contrast echo for better views.
The numerical heart of the report. Chamber sizes, wall thicknesses, ejection fraction, valve gradients, Doppler velocities, and estimated pressures — each with a number, a unit, and often a reference range.
A narrative description of each major heart structure: left ventricle, right ventricle, atria, each of the four valves, pericardium, and aorta. This is where "normal", "mildly abnormal", or specific abnormalities are described.
The "big picture" paragraph that synthesises the measurements and findings into a clinical impression. If you only read one section, read this one — but read it in the context of the full report, not alone.
Plain-language guidance on what should happen next: reassurance, repeat scan in X months, GP follow-up, cardiology referral, or further investigation. This is what to share with the clinician who will act on the report.
If the technical sections feel overwhelming, start with the conclusion and recommendations. These are written to be understandable without knowing the acronyms. Once you know what the report’s overall message is, the measurements and narrative findings support and explain that message — they are not a separate puzzle to solve.
The table below covers the measurements that appear on almost every adult echo report, with typical reference ranges from the British Society of Echocardiography and what each measurement is telling the clinician. Reference ranges vary slightly between laboratories and guidelines — your own report may use different thresholds, and a number outside the reference range is not automatically abnormal in your specific clinical context.
| Measurement | What It Is | Typical Normal Range | What It Tells You |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ejection Fraction (EF) | Percentage of blood pumped from the left ventricle per beat | 55–70% | Pumping strength of the left ventricle. Below 40% usually indicates systolic dysfunction; above 70% may suggest hypertrophic cardiomyopathy |
| LVEDD | Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (size of LV when filled) | 3.9–5.3 cm (women); 4.2–5.8 cm (men) | Chamber size. Enlargement suggests volume overload or dilated cardiomyopathy |
| LVESD | Left ventricular end-systolic diameter (size when contracted) | 2.1–3.5 cm (women); 2.5–4.0 cm (men) | Contractility. A high LVESD relative to LVEDD suggests reduced systolic function |
| IVSd | Interventricular septum thickness in diastole | ≤0.9 cm (women); ≤1.0 cm (men) | Wall thickening. Thickening is usually caused by hypertension or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy |
| LVPWd | Left ventricular posterior wall thickness in diastole | ≤0.9 cm (women); ≤1.0 cm (men) | Wall thickening on the back wall; interpreted alongside IVSd |
| LV Mass Index | Left ventricular mass corrected for body surface area | ≤95 g/m² (women); ≤115 g/m² (men) | Left ventricular hypertrophy — whether increased wall thickness is clinically significant |
| LAVI | Left atrial volume index (LA volume / body surface area) | ≤34 mL/m² | Left atrial enlargement. Raised LAVI is associated with atrial fibrillation, long-standing hypertension, and diastolic dysfunction |
| RVD (basal) | Right ventricular basal diameter | ≤4.1 cm | Right ventricular enlargement, suggesting pulmonary hypertension, PE, or RV cardiomyopathy |
| TAPSE | Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion | ≥17 mm | Right ventricular systolic function. Low TAPSE suggests RV dysfunction |
| E velocity | Early diastolic mitral inflow velocity | 0.6–1.3 m/s | Early filling pattern of the left ventricle — used alongside A and e’ to assess diastolic function |
| E/A ratio | Ratio of early (E) to late (A) mitral inflow velocities | ~0.8–2.0 (age-dependent) | Pattern of diastolic filling. Abnormal ratios suggest diastolic dysfunction |
| E/e’ ratio | Ratio of mitral E velocity to tissue Doppler e’ velocity | <8 normal; 8–14 borderline; >14 raised | Estimated left ventricular filling pressure. Raised values suggest heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) |
| PASP | Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (estimated from TR velocity) | <35 mmHg | Pulmonary artery pressure. Raised values suggest pulmonary hypertension |
| Aortic root diameter | Diameter of the aortic root at the sinuses of Valsalva | ≤3.7 cm (women); ≤4.0 cm (men) | Aortic root dilatation, which can progress to aneurysm if severe |
Reference ranges adapted from British Society of Echocardiography and American Society of Echocardiography adult guidelines. These ranges apply to adults of average build and may not be appropriate for athletes, very small or very large patients, or those with specific medical conditions. Your own report will use the reference ranges in place at the reporting laboratory at the time of your scan.
Ejection fraction (EF) is the single most recognised number on any echocardiogram report. It is the percentage of blood in the left ventricle that gets pumped out with each heartbeat. A heart that is completely full at the end of filling and then pumps out 60% of that volume has an EF of 60%. The remaining blood stays in the ventricle for the next cycle.
Because EF is the easiest echo number to understand, it is also the one patients worry about most. A lower-than-normal EF is taken by many people as "my heart is failing", but the clinical picture is more nuanced. A mildly reduced EF in an otherwise well person with no symptoms is treated completely differently from a severely reduced EF in someone with breathlessness and leg swelling. The number is a starting point for conversation, not the conversation itself.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a real and increasingly recognised condition — patients with breathlessness and heart failure symptoms but an EF in the normal range. The problem is with filling (diastolic function), not with contracting. If your EF is normal but you have symptoms, measurements like E/e’ ratio and left atrial volume index are what to look at next.
The standard thresholds used by cardiologists for classifying left ventricular systolic function.
For a full walkthrough of what EF means clinically, see our patient guide on ejection fraction explained.
Echo reports describe valve disease in two directions — narrowing (stenosis) and leakage (regurgitation) — and in four grades: trivial, mild, moderate, and severe. The grading thresholds are different for each valve and for each direction, so a "moderate" grade on one valve is not the same as "moderate" on another. The two tables below cover the two most commonly graded valve problems: aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation.
Graded using peak velocity, mean gradient, and aortic valve area. All three are usually reported together and interpreted alongside each other, because any single measurement can be misleading in isolation.
| Severity | Peak Velocity | Mean Gradient | Valve Area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal / sclerosis | <2.5 m/s | <10 mmHg | >1.5 cm² |
| Mild | 2.5–2.9 m/s | <20 mmHg | 1.5–2.0 cm² |
| Moderate | 3.0–3.9 m/s | 20–39 mmHg | 1.0–1.5 cm² |
| Severe | ≥4.0 m/s | ≥40 mmHg | <1.0 cm² |
Severe aortic stenosis usually prompts a cardiologist discussion about valve replacement — timing depends on symptoms, ejection fraction, and whether the patient is a candidate for surgical or transcatheter replacement.
Graded using multiple parameters including vena contracta width, regurgitant volume, regurgitant fraction, and the appearance of the colour Doppler jet. The severity is never based on jet appearance alone.
| Severity | Vena Contracta | Regurgitant Volume | Typical Finding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trivial | not measured | minimal | Physiological — very common, not a disease |
| Mild | <0.3 cm | <30 mL/beat | Small jet, usually asymptomatic |
| Moderate | 0.3–0.69 cm | 30–59 mL/beat | Intermediate picture — may warrant surveillance |
| Severe | ≥0.7 cm | ≥60 mL/beat | Large jet, LA enlargement, symptoms — may need surgery |
Severe mitral regurgitation in a symptomatic patient or with signs of LV dilatation usually prompts referral for discussion of mitral repair, often guided by transoesophageal echocardiography for surgical planning.
Echo reports commonly describe "trivial" or "physiological" regurgitation of the mitral, tricuspid, or pulmonary valves. This is not valve disease — it is a normal finding on almost every adult echo because the closing valves allow a tiny amount of backflow that modern ultrasound is sensitive enough to detect. Unless the report describes mild, moderate, or severe, trivial regurgitation is not clinically relevant and does not need follow-up.
Beyond the measurements, echo reports are full of technical phrases that mean specific things in cardiology. This glossary covers the ones patients most commonly ask about.
An echo report is not the end of the story — it is the start of a clinical conversation. Here is how to make the most of yours.
Before trying to interpret individual numbers, read the conclusion paragraph and the recommendations. These are written in plain language and tell you the overall message. Once you know the headline, the detail makes more sense.
The person best placed to interpret your echo report is the clinician who requested it, or the GP or cardiologist who will act on it. If you booked privately without a referral, your own GP is the usual next stop. Take a printed or emailed copy of the report — they need the full document, not just a summary.
Before the appointment, list the specific terms or numbers you do not understand, and the specific things you are worried about. A 10-minute appointment goes far quicker than you think — walking in with a short written list of questions makes sure you get answers to what actually matters to you.
Reference ranges are derived from populations. "Normal" means "within the range seen in most healthy adults". Your own baseline may sit at one end of that range for reasons that are completely benign — build, age, fitness level, blood pressure history. Ask your clinician what the numbers mean for you specifically, not just whether they fall inside or outside the reference range.
Sometimes an echo report will explicitly recommend further investigation, but sometimes the hint is subtle. Situations where a follow-up test is often the right next step:
Some echo findings need immediate rather than routine follow-up: severe aortic or mitral valve disease, a large pericardial effusion, suspected endocarditis or a visible vegetation, severe LV dysfunction, suspected aortic dissection, or a large intracardiac thrombus. If your report mentions any of these and you have not yet been contacted about next steps, contact the clinician who requested the scan promptly. If you are acutely symptomatic — severe chest pain at rest, collapse, new severe breathlessness — call 999.
Not necessarily. An EF of 50% falls into the "mildly reduced" range by most guidelines, but heart failure is a clinical diagnosis that depends on symptoms, signs, and other investigations — not on ejection fraction alone. Many people have an EF in the 45–54% range without symptoms and without any functional impairment. What matters is the combination of the number and the rest of the clinical picture, including how you feel, what your history is, and what other measurements on the report look like. Only a clinician who knows your full situation can interpret an individual EF.
No. Trivial mitral regurgitation is a normal finding on almost every adult echo. Modern ultrasound equipment is sensitive enough to detect the tiny amount of backflow that occurs as healthy valves close, and reporting it does not mean anything is wrong. The same applies to trivial regurgitation of the tricuspid and pulmonary valves. Unless the report describes the regurgitation as mild, moderate, or severe, it is a physiological finding and does not need treatment or follow-up.
LVH stands for left ventricular hypertrophy — thickening of the left ventricular walls. "Concentric" means the thickening is even all the way around (as opposed to "eccentric" or focal thickening in one region). Mild concentric LVH is most commonly caused by long-standing high blood pressure — the left ventricle thickens in response to the extra workload of pumping against a higher pressure. It can also be seen in athletes, in some inherited conditions, and with age. Your clinician will interpret it in the context of your blood pressure history, any symptoms, and other findings on the report.
Systolic function is how well the heart contracts and pushes blood out — the classic "pumping strength" measurement, captured in ejection fraction. Diastolic function is how well the heart relaxes and fills between beats. Both are essential: a heart can pump strongly but fail to fill properly, or fill well but pump weakly. Heart failure can be caused by either problem. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is increasingly recognised — the pumping function is normal but the filling function is impaired, so the heart still cannot meet the body’s needs.
A small pericardial effusion is a small collection of fluid in the sac that surrounds the heart. In many cases it is incidental — a common and often benign finding, particularly in women, after viral infections, or with inflammatory conditions. A small effusion without any haemodynamic effect usually needs monitoring rather than treatment. The clinical concern rises with larger effusions, with rapid accumulation, or with signs that the fluid is affecting the heart’s filling (tamponade). Your report’s conclusion should state whether the effusion is considered clinically significant in your case.
Echo imaging has limits, and a good reporter will be honest about them. Phrases like "cannot exclude", "limited views", "suboptimal windows", or "recommend confirmation with alternative imaging" mean the scan could not give a definitive answer to a particular question. This is not the sonographer being vague — it is them being accurate about what the images did and did not show. When you see this language, the recommendation usually points to a further test: contrast echo to improve image quality, TOE for more detailed valve assessment, or cardiac MRI for tissue characterisation.
Small variations between reports from different laboratories or different times are common and usually not clinically meaningful. Measurements can vary by a few percent between scans because of differences in the operator, the machine, the patient’s position, heart rate, and hydration. What matters is whether the trend is stable, improving, or worsening — not whether an individual number matches the previous one exactly. Your cardiologist will compare the reports and focus on meaningful changes rather than minor variations. If a finding has genuinely changed, the newer report will usually flag this in the conclusion.
Yes. Every Sonoworld echo report is written by a BSE-accredited consultant cardiac sonographer, and any unexpected or complex finding is reviewed with a consultant cardiologist before the report is issued — at no extra cost. If you would like a separate face-to-face cardiology consultation to discuss your report, that can be arranged as an additional service. Call the clinic on 020 3633 4902 to discuss the options.
Breathlessness has many possible causes, and not all of them are cardiac. Within cardiac causes, a normal ejection fraction does not rule out heart failure: heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a real condition where the pumping function is normal but the filling is impaired. In that case, measurements like E/e’ ratio and left atrial volume index on your report are what to look at. Non-cardiac causes include lung disease, anaemia, deconditioning, thyroid problems, and anxiety. If the echo is normal but you still feel unwell, discuss the symptoms with your GP — the next step is often a focused review rather than a repeat echo.
"Hyperdynamic" means the left ventricle is contracting more vigorously than normal — an EF above about 70%. In many situations it is a temporary response to something physiological — being anxious on the couch, mild dehydration, anaemia, thyroid overactivity, or simply being a young, fit person. In other situations it can reflect hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or systemic conditions like sepsis. An isolated hyperdynamic finding in an otherwise well person with no symptoms is usually not a cause for concern, but it is worth discussing with your clinician so that any underlying cause can be excluded.
29 Weymouth Street
London W1G 7DB
Nearest stations: Regent's Park (Bakerloo) · Great Portland Street (Circle, H&C, Metropolitan) · Baker Street (Jubilee, Bakerloo, Metropolitan)
Open in Google MapsFurther reading on echocardiography, the measurements discussed above, and other cardiac tests.
What a standard echo is and when it is used.
Which cardiac test answers which question.
Deep dive into the most-searched echo number.
Full pricing and what is included.